This term is restricted to a lessee.
Definition source
Kinnear, J. B., Digest of House of Lords Cases Decided on Appeal from Scotland, 1709-1864 — Glossary of Scottish Law Terms (Edinburgh, 1865). Public domain.
Legal Subject: tenant |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hepburn and Massow v. Duff and Davidson | 1793 | Prescription, Tack, Aliment, Thirlage, tenant, Sasine | Robert William Duff and his tenant John Donaldson, defenders in the action by Hepburn and Massow, petitioned against Lord Monboddo's interlocutors. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| James Ayton v. James Bruce | 1785 | Aliment, Lease, Succession, Tack, Interlocutor, tenant | James Ayton of Kippo leased his mill to James Bruce, along with the right to mill grain produced on surrounding properties that were possessed by tenants. While the lease to Bruce was still in effect, Ayton took back the land that had been leased to tenants and stopped taking that land’s produce to the mill. Bruce claimed that he should receive a corresponding abatement of his rent. |
| Magistrates of Perth v. Andrew | 1797 | Tack, Rent, Lease, Mala Fides, tenant, Possession | The Magistrates of Perth sought John Andrew’s removal from leased lands following the expiration of his lease, while Andrew claimed that permission from his brother to cultivate adjacent land constituted tacit consent to his continued possession. After Lord Armadale pronounced an interlocutor against him, Andrew petitioned the Court to alter that decision, prompting the Magistrates and Town-Council of Perth, along with Charles Bruce as Treasurer, to answer his petition and defend against the charge of horning. |
| Scott v. Brodie | 1802 | Possession, tenant, Debt, Aliment, Arrestment, Proof | John Scott purchased a farm in Ormiston, which was in possession of Mr. Brodie, as a tenant. As a result of landlord petitions, the Lord Ordinary issued a bill of suspension an interdict against the tenant. Parties discussed if Mr. Brodie was entitled to an away-going crop of that land or if the petitioner was entitled to the value of the crop, without allowance for feed and labour. |
Documents discussing this subject (showing 100 of 108)
- Alexander Buchanan v. Charles S. Parker — Report, 7 Sep 1826
- Alexander Thomson v. John Reid — Duplies, 11 Feb 1809
- Ans. Mr HENRY HALL, TO THE Pet. & Comp. J. RUTHERFORD, Esq; Arch. Tod, W. S. Agent. ANSWERS FOR Mr HENRY HALL, late Tenant at Linthaughlee; TO THE PETITION and COMPLAINT of JOHN RU
- APPENDIX. CLASS FIRST. Containing LETTERS relative to the terms on which Harpsdale undertook the management of Southdun's executry.
- APPENDIX. MINUTE of TACK, by John Drummond, Esq. TO Thomas Taylor.
- APPENDIX. TACK between JAMES READ YEAMAN, Esq. and PETER GILRUTH.
- Balgray's Trustees v. Ewart — Interlocutor, 25 Nov 1840
- Captain James M'Lean v. Lord Macdonald — Answers, 3 Jan 1822
- Charles Fraser v. Thomas Alexander Fraser — Answers, 30 Dec 1824 [2]
- Christian Kelso v. John Reid — Answers, 24 Jan 1826
- Condie of Strowie v. Principal and Masters of the United Colleges of St. Salvator and St. Leonard, in St. Andrews — Memorial, 21 Jun 1796
- Daniel Vere v. David Dale — Information, 5 Apr 1803 [2]
- David Henderson of Stempster v. John Sinclair of Ulbster — 1771
- Defenders' Statement of Facts, and Pursuer's Answers thereto.
- Duff — Petition, 13 Nov 1793
- Executors of the deceased Earl of Kintore v. Francis Alexander, Earl of Kintore, and his Curators — Revised Minute of Debate, 5 Nov 1846
- Fishwick Gibson v. John Scott — Answers, 8 Sep 1825
- Francis Ross v. Robert Carrick — Information, 12 Nov 1800
- George Anderson v. Alexander Barclay — Reclaiming Note
- George Dalziel v. Allan Lockhart — Answers, 13 Feb 1765
- Gordon of Cluny v. James Robertson and Others; John Anderson and Others — Opinion, 8 Mar 1825
- James Ayton v. James Bruce — Petition, 4 Feb 1785
- James Bell v. John Rutherford — Answers, 25 Apr 1793
- James Cheap v. William Morehead — Answers, 11 Nov 1790
- James Duff v. Mrs Mary Bradberry — Petition, 3 Dec 1823
- James Gammell v. William Weir and John Barr — Memorial
- James Gammell v. William Wier and John Barr — Answers, 1820
- James Heddle v. James Baikie — Reclaiming Petition, 2 Dec 1840
- James Hepburn, William Foot and William M‘Gregor v. The Tay Navigation Commissioners — Complainers' Case, 7 Feb 1843
- James Lockhart v. John Cathcart, Esq. of Genoch — Reclaiming, 13 Dec 1832
- James Lyall v. John Cruden Blair — Answers, 22 May 1824
- James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Answers, 1832 [2]
- James Miller v. Lord and Lady Gwydir — Answers, 4 Sep 1823
- James Morgan v. Viscount of Arbuthnot — Replies, 14 Jun 1791 [2]
- James Waddel v. John Brown — Answers, 4 Sep 1794
- John Boyd v. John Shaw — Respondents' Case, 16 Jan 1827 [2]
- John Earl of Rothes v. Alexander Shepherd — Answers, 18 Dec 1766
- John Francis Erskine and John Thomas Erskine v. Edward Alexander — Answers
- John Gillies & others v. William Muirhead — Information, 8 Jan 1793
- John Hay v. John Cumming — Answers, 1 Nov 1849
- John Morrison v. John Turnbull Junior and John Gibson — Answers, 26 Feb 1824
- John Ravenscroft v. Jean Halliday, John M‘Chefney and Margaret M‘Chefney — Answers, 4 Mar 1793
- John Stirling Napier v. Hugh Ferrier — Reclaiming Note, 17 Nov 1846 [2]
- John Turnbull and John Gibson v. John Morrison — Appendix, 15 Jun 1822
- John Viscount of Arbuthnott v. Colin Gillies — Answers, 20 Feb 1793
- John Wright v. Peter Brember — Answers, 29 Jun 1810
- John, Walter, William, Magaret, Catherine, and Janet Thomsons v. Colonel James Stewart Oliphant — Answers, 9 Jun 1823 [2]
- King & Caldwall v. King — Answers, 5 Oct 1765
- LC Volume 03 — Petition, 6 Dec 1811 [2]
- Lieutenant-Colonel John Gordon of Cluny v. John Anderson and Others — Revised Condescendence and Answers [2]
- Lord Blantyre's Tutors v. John M'Nair — Replies, 5 Jun 1833
- Magistrates and Town-Council of the Burgh of Perth v. John Andrew — Memorial, 28 Nov 1797
- Margaret Scot v. James Buchanan — Information, 15 Nov 1762
- Margaret Smellie v. John Cochrane — Revised Condescendence and Answers
- Min. in Process Mrs BINGHAM, AGAINST Sir Charles Douglas's TRUSTEES. MINUTES PETITION of Edward Ommaney, Esq; and others, Trustees of Sir Charles Douglas.
- Nathaniel Stevenson v. David Cooper and Duncan Clark — Bill of Advocation, 14 Apr 1821
- Nathaniel Stevenson v. David Cooper and Duncan Clerk — Answers, 8 Dec 1821
- No. I. EXAMINATION OF JOHN PATERSON. In presence of James Maidment, Esq., Advocate, Commissioner, and Charles J. F. Orr, W.S., Common Agent in the Ranking and Sale at the instance
- No. III. ATTESTED COPY of the INTERLOCUTOR pronounced by LORD ELDIN, Ordinary on the Bill of Suspension for John CRUDEN BLAIR, Tenant in Lundin of Gallery; AGAINST James Lyall, Esq
- No. III. PROOF adduced for Mr ALLAN, Petitioner, regarding Dung.
- Officers of State v. Earl of Aberdeen — objections, 13 May 1799
- Parker v. Buchanan — 27 Jan 1827
- Patrick Duff v. Patrick Sellar — Petition and Complaint, 13 May 1808
- Perth Harbour Commissioners v. Andrew Swan — Minute, 8 Mar 1851 [2]
- Petition — Alexander Houstoun against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — Allan Maclean
- Petition — Angus M'Millan against Lord Dunsinnan's Interlocutor
- Petition — Charles Campbell
- Petition — February 23, 1821. Pet.—Lieut.-Col. Gilmour against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutor
- Petition — J. Thomson, Gibson & Co. against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutor [2]
- Petition — Ja. Gammell, Esq. against Lord Cringletie's Interlocutors
- Petition — John Morrison against Lord Meadowbank's Interlocutors
- Petition — Lady Montgomerie against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — Miss H. Leslie against Lord Armadale's Interlocutor
- Petition — Mr. Alexander Wood, Minister of the Gospel at Rosemarkie, Mr. James Robertson, Professor of Oriental Languages in the University of Edinburgh, and others, Creditors of the deceased Adam Gordon of Ardoch
- Petition — Nathaniel Stevenson against Lord Pitmilly's Interlocutor
- Petition — Peter Cochrane, Esq. against Lord Alloway's Interlocutor
- Poor Thomas Pratt v. James Bruce and Lord Dundas — Answers
- PROOF for the Earl of Fife.
- Reclaiming Note, Anthony Donald against Lord Newton's Interlocutor
- Reclaiming Petition — Sir J. G. Sinclair, and Curators, Reclaiming against Inner-House Interlocutor
- RECORD. RE-REVISED CONDESCENDENCE for Pursuer; AND RE-REVISED ANSWERS for DEFENDERS.
- Riddell v. Hope — Petition, 14 Dec 1796
- Robert Home-Gordon, Esq; of Embo, and others v. Captain Alexander Sutherland of the 71st Regiment of Foot — Proof, 14 Apr 1791
- Robert Home-Gordon, Esq; of Embo, and Others v. Captain Gordon Clunes of Whitehill — Proof, 14 Apr 1791
- Robert Skirving and George Young v. Robert Vernor — Memorial, 27 Feb 1796
- Rolland — Petition, 14 Feb 1797
- Samuel C. Hardie v. Charles Tait — Answers
- Sir James Campbell v. Katharine Renfrew, alias Watt — Memorial, 12 Feb 1795
- Sir Robert Pollock v. Thomas Paton — Memorial, 24 Jul 1777
- Spencer Sutherland and Company v. John Hay — Pleas in Law, 1842
- State of the Process — Proceedings in Process of Division [2]
- Sydserrf v. Dods — Bill of Advocation, 11 Jan 1854
- The Magistrates and Town-Council of the Burgh of Perth and Charles Bruce v. John Andrew — Answers, 14 Feb 1798
- The Right Honourable the Earl of Marchmont v. The Right Honourable Alexander Earl of Home — Answers, 31 Jan 1777
- Thomas Aitchison v. William, Earl of Mansfield — Reclaiming Note, 12 Feb 1830 [2]
- Thomas Ogilvie v. Charles Hamilton — Answers, 12 Nov 1746
- Thomas Pratt v. James Bruce; Lawrence Lord Dundas — Condescendence, 24 Jun 1822
- Tutors of Lord Blantyre v. John M'Nair — Duplies, 27 Jun 1832 [2]
- Tutors to the Right Honourable Lord Blantyre v. John M'Nair, Junior — Replies, 18 Apr 1832
