Legal Subject: Sell of goods |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson and Company v. Hamilton and Company | 1772 | Debt, Agent, Sell of goods, Arrestment, Interlocutor, Libel | James Wilson and Company of Kilmarnock manufactured woolen carpets for sale in London. Since 1762, Malcolm Hamilton and Company had served as James Wilson & Company's London agent . The dispute related to a large quantity of James Wilson & Company's carpets left in a wharf cellar in London for five years. James Wilson & Company argued that because of Malcolm Hamiliton & Company's negligence it suffered some loss. The pursuer claimed that the carpets had been significantly damaged due to Malcolm Hamiliton & Company's neglect. The defender disputed these claims. |
Documents discussing this subject (22)
- APPENDIX No. I. STATE of GEORGE CUMMINGS'S Affairs.
- APPENDIX. CONDESCENDENCE FOR DANIEL TAYLOR, Writer in Edinburgh.
- APPENDIX. No. I. LETTER of GUARANTEE by Messrs Steel Nisbet & Co. to Messrs Wilhelm & Jan Willink, Amsterdam.
- APPENDIX. No. I. No. II. No. III. Copy LETTER, D. Taylor & Sons to Mr P. Lyon, Druggist, Edinburgh, dated 14th September 1798, and Excerpt from the Invoice, as to the contents of a
- APPENDIX. No. II. PURSUER'S PROOF.
- APPENDIX. N° I. Dr, Mr David Whyte, in account with John Rankine, Cr.
- George Park v. James Arnot — Answers
- George Park v. James Arnot — Memorial, 4 Jan 1762 [2]
- III.—STATEMENT of FACTS for DEFENDER, WITH ANSWERS thereto for PURSUERS; IV.—PLEAS in LAW for Pursuers; V.—PLEAS in LAW for Defender; VI.—INTERLOCUTOR CLOSING RECORD.
- James Likly v. Ralph Stevenson and Andrew Stevenson — Answers, 1823
- James Morison v. Thomas Boswell — Answers, 31 May 1803
- John Sword v. William Auld — Proof, 27 Jun 1791
- Petition — John Moyes, Master of the Margaret of Leith; and John Galloway Merchant in Leith, Owner, or part Owner, of said Vessel
- PLEAS IN LAW. ADDITIONS to the REPLIES for THOMAS STEVENSON and COMPANY.
- Reclaiming Petition — Messrs. Henry Scotland & Co. against Interlocutor of Lord Glenlee
- Thomas Bishop and Edward Railton v. Directors of the Mersey and Clyde Steam Navigation Company — Replies, 18 May 1826 [2]
- Thomas Bishop and Mandatory v. The Directors of the Clyde and Mersey Steam-Navigation Company, Matthew Wotherspoon and Alexander Johnston — Note, 3 Dec 1828
- Thomas Ridley and Company and F. A. Bell v. William Sloan — Statement of Facts, 9 Feb 1836
- Thomas Ridley and Company and Frederick A. Bell v. William Sloan — Revised Condescendence and Answers, 1835
- Thomas Stevenson & Co. v. Messrs Maxwell & Co., Robert M'Nair, James Ure, and Michael Russel — Replies, 1 Sep 1829
- Thomas Stewart v. William Rattray and William Alexander — Condescendence
- William Fulton v. Alexander Watt — 10 Aug 1847
