Confirmation, Charter of. The modern form of a disposition to a purchaser includes the clauses of a charter a me as well as de me; and when the disponee has taken infeftment on the indefinite precept of sasine, contained in a disposition, with this double manner of holding, such infeftment will not only constitute a valid base right in the person of the disponee, from the date of the infeftment; but the superior may, by confirmation, render that infeftment equivalent to infeftment on a precept of sasine granted by himself, and thus render the right public. This is accomplished by a charter of confirmation from the superior; so called, because it ratifies and confirms the right granted to the purchaser, and the sasine following upon it.
Definition source
Bell, William, A Dictionary and Digest of the Law of Scotland, 7th ed. rev. George Ross (Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute, 1861), s.v. “Confirmation.” Public domain.
Legal Subject: Confirmation |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Buchanan and John Auld v. Adam Grant | 1784 | Debt, Arrestment, Succession, Sequestration, Trustee, Confirmation | This case was about the payment of a decedent’s debts. James Buchanan and John Auld, pursuers, were creditors to an estate under the supervision of a factor, William Galdie. According to the pursuers, William died owing a balance to the estate. To recover the balance, the pursuers attempted to arrest funds in the hands of William’s creditors, including defenders Adam Grant and John Wood. However, these arrestments were ineffective because the defenders had already distributed most of William’s funds at the direction of his general disponee, George Galdie. The pursuers argued that these distributions could not defeat their claims, because George lacked the legal title necessary to order them. The pursuers also claimed that the payments were part of a scheme to favor certain creditors. |
| Thomas McAllan v. Hugh Bell | 1790 | Debt, Bankruptcy, Bill of Exchange, Sequestration, Confirmation, Diligence | In the case between pursuer Thomas McAllan and defender Hugh Bell, John, David, and Robert Jobson, as trustees and executors of the deceased David Jobson, petitioned the Court to permit sequestration of David Ogilvie's estate under the 1789 Act for rendering payment of creditors more equal and expeditious. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Walter Sloan-Laurie v. Alexander Spalding-Gordon | 1779 | Next of Kin, Confirmation, Compensation, Debt, Arrestment, Succession | This is one of several cases litigated by the heirs of Walter Laurie of Redcastle. Laurie of Redcastle was a creditor of Robert Gordon of Shirmers. After Laurie's death, his nephew, James Laurie, assumed ownership of his uncle's moveable effects, for which he obtained partial confirmation. Thirty-five years later, after the death of James Laurie, his nephew Walter Sloan-Laurie brought action against Alexander Spalding-Gordon, the representative of the deceased Robert Gordon, for payment of the aforementioned debt. The defender, Spalding-Gordon, argued that as he had been a creditor of the late James Laurie sufficient to compensate, this debt was extinguished. The pursuer argued that because James Laurie had never been fully confirmed as an heir, the credit remained in bonis (in the goods of) Walter Laurie of Redcastle. Lord Hailes ruled in favor of the defender. The pursuer then appealed to the full court, which decided in his favor. |
| William Lenox and Others v. Robert Grant | 1784 | Debt, Adjudication, Succession, Ranking of Creditors, Confirmation, Executor | Robert Grant, defender, petitioned the Court to alter its recent interlocutor in the action raised against him by William Lenox and others. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
Documents discussing this subject (63)
- Adam Grant Dyer and John Wood v. James Buchanan and John Auld — Answers, 28 Jan 1784
- ANS.—FIFE BANKING COMPANY, TO PET.—George Swayne. S. C. Somerville, W. S. Agent for Respondents. Walker, Richardson, & Melville, Agents for Petitioner. Mr Buchanan, Clerk, ANSWERS
- ANSWER for Miss CHRISTIE. ANSWER for Miss C. L. Jamieson and Others. ANSWER for Miss CHRISTIE.
- Appeal for David Duff, Trustee duly elected by a majority of Creditors in value, and claiming to be Trustee on the Sequestrated Estates of Archibald Menzies, Hotel-Keeper, Aberfeldy, and for Robert Kennedy, Distiller, Ballechin; Robert Grant, Hotel-K
- APPENDIX. CLASS FIRST. Containing LETTERS relative to the terms on which Harpsdale undertook the management of Southdun's executry.
- APPENDIX. No. I. CARTA CONFIRMACONIS P. Monastio Sancte Crucis de Edynburgh de Diversis Tris et Ecclesiis. Datis et Concessis Eidem Monastio et Canonicis P. David Quondam Regem Sco
- Archibald Craig v. Emilia Brodie — Petition, 9 Aug 1773
- Charles Ferrier v. Miss Mary Jane M'Donald Lockhart — Answers, 20 Jun 1837 [2]
- DUPLIES FOR The FIFE BANKING COMPANY, and for GEORGE AITKEN, Esq. their Cashier ; TO THE REPLIES for George Swayne, Tutor-at-law for Mary Spittal Swayne ; and James Petty, Writer,
- Edward Milligan, Esq. and Others v. Elizabeth Milligan and Husband — Information, 18 Jan 1825
- Elizabeth Milligan or Burnie v. Edward Milligan and John Kerr — Information, 7 Apr 1825
- Erskine v. Hay-Balfour — Petition, 20 Dec 1766
- Gavin Struthers & others v. John Lang — Answers, 2 Sep 1824
- Geddes — Answers, 10 Oct 1793
- Haig v. Lord Swinton's Interlocutor — Petition, 28 Feb 1786
- Hamilton v. Hamilton's Creditors — Answers, 19 Feb 1778
- Hamilton v. Hamilton's Creditors — Petition, 24 Jan 1777
- IV.—STATEMENT OF FACTS for the Defender, AND ANSWERS thereto for the Pursuer.
- James Stewart v. James Earl of Fife — Complainers' Case, 14 Dec 1826
- John Crawford v. Charles Grace — Answers, 21 Jun 1820
- John Lang v. Gavin Struthers, James Struthers and Jean Struthers — Answers, 9 Dec 1825
- John Matheson v. John Mactavish — Answers, 30 Sep 1824 [2]
- John Spence v. Messrs. James and Charles Nairne and J. P. Bertram — Answers, 4 Feb 1824
- John Watson v. Sarah Marshall and Others — petition, 31 Jan 1782
- John Watson v. Sarah Marshall — answers, 13 Dec 1781
- Lieutenant-Colonel James Taylor v. Sir William Forbes, J. Hunter and Company — Note of Pleas in Law [2]
- Malcolm Nicolson and Martin Martin v. Ralph Erskine Scott — Answers, 17 Jun 1836
- MANIFEST of the Cargo on board the Ship SARAH, Captain MATTHEW DUNNETT, from Alexandria in Virginia.
- Margaret Brisbane v. William Jack — Information, 24 May 1791
- Margaret Forrester and Alexander Kirk v. Mrs Jean Rymer and Mrs Ann Rymer — Answers, 8 Apr 1813
- Messrs. Nairne v. Mr. Spence and Messrs. Campbell and Burnside — Note
- Michael Rowand v. Sir Colin Campbell and Captain Patrick Campbell — Answers, 3 Jan 1824
- Ministers of Kingbarns v. Hay, et al — Answers, 6 Sep 1798
- Miss Jane Johnstone and Others v. John Muir Lowden — Reclaiming Note, 4 Jan 1838
- Misses Grizel and Helen Leslie v. Dr Gavin Gibb, and Others, Trustees of the late James M'Indoe, and John Morison of Craigend — Answers, 12 Nov 1825
- Petition — George Swayne against the Fife Banking Company Walker, Richardson, & Melville, W.S
- Petition — Henry Mackenzie, Esq; against Lord Bannatyne's Interlocutor
- Petition — John Crawford, Esq. against an Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — John Jobson for Sequestrating D
- Petition — John Mactavish for Power to Mr Archibald Alison to Report
- Petition — John Stuart for Warrant of Service
- Petition — Martin Ramsay and his Tutors, and of William Glover Wright in Leith, Defenders
- Petition — Martin Ramsay, and his Tutors, and of William Glover Wright in Leith, Defenders
- Petition — Mess. Francis Garbet and Co. of Carron-Wharf, in the county of Stirling
- Petition — Messrs Francis Garbet and Company, of Carron Wharf, in the County of Stirling
- Petition — Mrs. Anna Campbell, Daughter to Sir James Campbell of Auchinbreck, and of Mary Steuart, Daughter to Robert Steuart of Appine
- Petition — Peggy Kelvie against Lord Eldin's Interlocutor
- Reclaiming Petition — Add. Pet.—Mrs H. Moodie against Inner-House Interlocutor [2]
- Reclaiming Petition — Mrs E. Burnie & Husband against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Reclaiming Petition — William Adam, Esq; against an Inner-House Interlocutor [2]
- REVISED STATEMENT OF FACTS for DEFENDER, AND ANSWERS thereto for Pursuers.
- Sir Colin Campbell and Captain Patrick Campbell v. Michael Rowand — Memorial, 4 Sep 1823
- Steel v. Earl of Home — Petition, 7 Mar 1765
- Thomas Dickson v. William Baillie — Defences, 10 Jun 1845
- Walter Sloan-Laurie v. Alexander Spalding-Gordon — Memorial, 23 Jul 1779
- William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Answers, 19 May 1810
- William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Answers, 21 Feb 1809
- William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Duplies, 27 May 1809
- William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Memorial, 26 Jan 1810
- William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Memorial, 9 Feb 1810 [2]
- William Adam v. George Harley Drummond — Replies, 20 Apr 1809
- William Gordon and others v. Elizabeth Wallace — Answers, 3 Jan 1767
- William Lenox and Others v. Robert Grant — Petition, 8 Dec 1784