Legal Subject: Breach of Contract |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. R. Henderson v. John Mackay | 1831 | Diligence, Employment, Damages, Contract, Interlocutor, Breach of Contract | |
| Alexander v. Beaumont | 1772 | Contracts and Obligations, Breach of Contract, Debt, Contract, Tack, Aliment | Robert Alexander hired John Beaumont in 1770 to mine the coal on Alexander's property in Blackhouse and Boghall in Ayrshire. Under the contract, Beaumont was to deliver coal from Alexander's property to the harbor of Ayr. Beaumont brought the coal to the harbor, but he claimed that there were no people who could receive on Alexander's behalf. Beaumont applied to William Alexander, the brother of Robert, for instructions. According to Beaumont, William directed him to offer the coal to the Newton Company or a third party, or to "bing" the coals "on the hill." The parties disagreed over the expenses incurred for coal binged on the hill. Alexander also accused Beaumont of failing to separate the bings of great coal from the bings of pan wood. Alexander believed that some coal caught fire because of Beaumont's alleged failure to separate great coal from pan wood. |
| Hill v. Swinton | 1796 | Contract, Security, Deed, Breach of Contract, Debt, Copyright | Peter Hill, bookseller in Edinburgh, sought to relinquish his interest in the copyright of a book he had contracted to publish with John Swinton, Advocate. Swinton maintained that Hill remained bound by the agreement to accept delivery of sixty copies annually until all four hundred and eighty-six remaining copies were delivered. The pleadings set forth the parties' competing positions on the enforceability of the publication contract and the disposition of the unsold stock. |
Documents discussing this subject (45)
- A. R. Henderson v. John Mackay — Revised, 4 Oct 1832
- Alexander Laurence v. George Gordon and Alexander Stewart — Mutual, 26 Apr 1832
- Andrew Russell v. Thomas Rae — Reclaiming Note, 1828
- APPENDIX TO THE PETITION of WILLIAM RATTRAY and WILLIAM ALEXANDER, printed by order of Court. No. I. LETTERS, Mr THOMAS STEWART to Mr WEIGENT.
- Archibald Reid Henderson v. John M'Kay — Advocation, 30 Sep 1831
- CSP-81 unsorted seg023
- David Hatton v. James Pedie — Reclaiming Note, 5 Jan 1829
- David Turnbull v. James Rankines, John Rankines and John Black — Answers, 2 Jan 1796
- Dugald Campbell v. Hugh Price, James Stevenson, and James Alexander — Condescendence
- Duncan M'Dougal v. George Pentland — Answers, 7 Jan 1815
- Evander M'Iver Reid v. William Steel — Reclaiming Petition
- Evander Maciver Reid v. William Steele — Appendix, 7 Feb 1822
- James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Answers, 1832
- James Morison v. Thomas Boswell — Answers, 31 May 1803
- James Morrison v. Thomas Boswell — Answers, 16 Jan 1806
- John Barclay v. Patrick Whitson Jun. — Summons, 13 Dec 1823 [3]
- John Cooper v. John William Bell & Others — Bill of Suspension, 15 Jan 1836
- John Stein v. Sir John Henderson of Fordel — Answers, 16 Jun 1808
- John Turner v. Joseph Lauchlan — Answers, 15 Sep 1787
- John William Bell v. John Cooper — Summons, 16 Jan 1836
- John William Bell v. Samuel Asbury, Watson, Pellat, and Company, John Watson, Frederick Pellat, and John Henry Watson — Summons, 16 Jan 1836
- John William Bell v. Watson, Pellat, & Company — Summons, 21 Apr 1837
- Kirkland, Neilson, and Company v. William Cochrane — Answers, 4 Sep 1823
- M'Crackan v. Pulline — Petition, 1 Feb 1775
- Matthew Montgomerie v. Messrs Peter and Francis Forresters and Company — Information, 14 Apr 1791 [2]
- No. V. DEFENDERS' STATEMENT OF FACTS, with ANSWERS thereto for PURSUERS.
- Peter Hill v. John Swinton — Information, 20 Dec 1796
- Petition — George Pentland against Lord Armadale's Interlocutor [2]
- Petition — James Morrison against Innerhouse Interlocutor
- Petition — James Morrison against Innerhouse Interlocutor [2]
- Petition — Kirkland, Neilson, & Company against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — Mr & Mrs Aitchison against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — Walter Brown against Lord Dunsinnan's Interlocutors
- Petition — William Rattray against Lord Hermand's Interlocutor [2]
- Reclaiming Petition — Messrs. Henry Scotland & Co. against Interlocutor of Lord Glenlee
- Reclaiming Petition — Sir John Henderson, Bart. against Lord Dunsinnan's Interlocutor
- Samuel Asbury v. John William Bell — Answers, 5 Dec 1835
- Smith v. Baker — Petition, 18 Feb 1772
- Taylor and Norie v. Charles M'Lean — Answers, 17 Dec 1795
- Thomas Stewart v. James Scott — Answers
- Vincent Higgins & Sons v. Dunlop, Wilson, & Company — Bill of Exceptions, 13 Jan 1847
- Vincent Higgins and Sons v. Dunlop, Wilson and Company — Answers
- William Cochran v. Kirkland, Neilson and Company — Answers, 3 Jan 1823
- William M'Donald v. Messrs. Mackie and Company — Answers, 6 Feb 1829
- William Macdonald v. Messrs Mackie & Co. — Revised Case, 26 May 1829