To provide the minister of Peebles with a grass glebe, the presbytery appropriated a small field that was held in feu by the pursuer, William Laidlaw. The field was part of a tract commonly understood to have been the vicar’s glebe before church lands fell to the sovereign at the Reformation. While not contesting the appropriation of his land, Mr. Laidlaw claimed that certain statutes entitled him to relief from the heritors of all other church lands within the parish. However, Ann Elliot argued that only heritors of the vicar’s glebe were required to contribute. The court found that Act 1594, c. 202, provided a general right of relief from heritors of church lands in the parish.
Documents in this case (2)
People involved
- William Laidlaw — Pursuer
- Ann Elliot — Defender
- Geo. Robinson, W.S — Agent
- G. Clk. — Clerk
- James Gordon — Advocate for Pursuer
- T. Cranstoun, W.S. — Agent
- Sir James Montgomery, of Stanhope, Bart. — Advocate for Defender
- John Swinton, Lord Swinton — Lord Ordinary
- John Wightman — Named in case documents
- David Plenderleath — Named in case documents
Places
- Peebles (principal)
To provide the minister of Peebles with a grass glebe, the presbytery appropriated a small field that was held in feu by the pursuer, William Laidlaw. The field was part of a tract commonly understood to have been the vicar’s glebe before church lands fell to the sovereign at the Reformation. While not contesting the appropriation of his land, Mr. Laidlaw claimed that certain statutes entitled him to relief from the heritors of all other church lands within the parish. However, Ann Elliot argued that only heritors of the vicar’s glebe were required to contribute. The court found that Act 1594, c. 202, provided a general right of relief from heritors of church lands in the parish.
