Legal Subject: Lis Alibi Pendens |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hunt v. Wilson and Robb | 1786 | Arrestment, Diligence, Sist, Sequestration, Debt, Lis Alibi Pendens | John Wilson and James Robb, as present Provost and Jailor, argued that they were not liable to William Love because a lis pendens barred diligence from the pursuer Hunt’s bill-chamber appearance. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
Documents discussing this subject (6)
- Alexander Brymner v. Robert Crawford Riddell — Memorial, 22 May 1809
- Answers—Jean Brown, or Monkhouse, TO THE Petition—Michael Gilfillan, FOR RECALL OF INHIBITION. ANSWERS FOR JEAN BROWN, alias MONKHOUSE, Spouse of Richard Monkhouse, formerly residi
- Captain Hamilton v. The Dutch East India Company — Information
- J. & R. Tennent v. Messrs Charles Tennant and Company — Answers, 6 Sep 1821
- Reclaiming Petition — Fife Banking Company against Lord Alloway's Interlocutor
- William Hunt junior v. John Wilson and James Robb — Memorial, 12 Jun 1786
