Legal Subject: Collusion |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anstruther-Paterson v. Rutherfurd | 1791 | Election contest, Election, Oath, Aliment, Collusion, Feu duties | Documents available Full description in progress. |
| Mustart v. Stonefield's Interlocuter | 1794 | Impress Service, Contract, Interlocutor, Interdict, Fraud, Collusion | Alexander Muftart and John Muftart petitioned the Court of Session to alter its recent interlocutor in their case against Stonefield. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Smart v. Interlocutor of Court | 1793 | Hypothec, Debt, Interlocutor, Bankruptcy, Collusion, Contract | John Smart presented a reclaiming petition asking the Court of Session to alter its recent interlocutor. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
Documents discussing this subject (48)
- Adam Thomson, Esq. of Muncraig, and others, Freeholders of the Stewartry of Kirkcud-bright v. John Welsh, Sheriff-substitute of the Shire of Dumfries — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Alex. Watson v. Ann & Isobel Watsons — Interlocutor, 15 Feb 1834
- Alexander Abercromby v. Adam Thomson — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Alexander Chalmers v. John Duff — Answers, 17 Jul 1787
- Alexander Watson v. Ann Watson and Isobel Watson — Report, 3 Jan 1834
- ANS.—Adam Thomson, Esq. &c. TO THE Pet. & Comp.—George Tod. J. Gordon, jun. W. S. Agent. Mr Menzies, Clerk. ANSWERS FOR Adam Thomson, Esq. of Muncraig, and others, Freeholders of t
- Answers — Ans.—W. Scoon & R. Bryden, to the Pet.—Whitelaw & Kirk
- Charles Greenhill v. Catherine Aitkin — Answers, 20 Jun 1821
- Donald M'Lean v. Auchinvole and Cuthbertson — Answers, 22 Apr 1824
- Duncan MacDougal, junior v. Robert Brown, junior — Replies
- Duncan Macdougall jun. v. James Inglis, James Watson and Robert Watson — Answers, 17 Jan 1809
- III.—RESPONDENT'S STATEMENT of FACTS. IV.—PLEAS in LAW for the SUSPENDER. V.—PLEAS in LAW for RESPONDENT. VI.—COPY PRODUCTIONS with Note of Suspension and Interdict. 2. Sheriff-Cou
- Ilay Ferrier v. William Morehead — Answers, 24 Feb 1791
- James Bell v. Isobel King — Memorial, 15 Dec 1796
- James Duff and William Duff v. Laurence Sutherland — Answers, 22 Jun 1793
- Jane Arundell St Aubyn v. Captain Charles O'Bryen — Appendix, 22 May 1813
- John Boyd v. Alexander Napier — Reasons, 26 Jun 1828
- John Maclauchlane v. Archibald Maccorkle and Janet Shaw — Memorial, 15 Apr 1763
- John Rutherfurd v. Philip Anstruther-Paterson — Proof, 17 Feb 1791
- Major John Ross v. Adam Thomson — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Memorial — Jane Arundell St Aubyn, Spouse of Charles O'Bryen, formerly of the Plymouth Division of Marines, and now of the 1st Regiment of Devonshire Militia; and Donald Maclean, Writer to the Signet, her At
- Messrs Robert Denniston & Company v. John Thomson — Answers, 3 Jan 1822
- Michael Gilfillan and Mary Bogle v. William Goodwin — Duplies, 2 Oct 1823
- Mrs. Darling and her Children v. James Adamson — Reclaiming Note, 17 Nov 1837
- Mrs. Marianne Homfray v. Patrick Wishart — Memorial, 17 Dec 1813 [2]
- Muir & Company v. M'Donald & M'Nab — Bill of Suspension, 29 May 1830
- Mustart v. Stonefield's Interlocuter — Petition, 4 Mar 1794
- Patrick M'Dowall, Writer in Dumfries v. Adam Thomson, Esq. of Muncraig, and others, Freeholders of the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Petition — Duncan M'Goun, one of the Individual Partners of the late Company of M'Gouns, Watson, and Company, Merchants in Greenock, who also carried on Business at St Thomas, under the Firm of James Blain and Company, with Concurrence of Archibald…
- Petition — John Gordon. & Others against Lord Pitmilly's Interlocutor
- Petition — John Rutherfurd, Esq; against an Inner-house Interlocutor
- Petition — John Smart against Interlocutor of Court
- Petition — John Smart. against Lord Dreghorn's Interlocutor
- Petition — Petition Arthur Barclay for Discharge
- Philip Anstruther Paterson v. John Rutherfurd — Answers, 8 Feb 1791
- Philip Anstruther-Paterson v. John Rutherfurd — Proof, 1 Mar 1791
- Rep. P. ANSTRUTHER PATERSON, TO THE Ans. JOHN RUTHERFORD, Esq; and WILLIAM ELLIOT, Esq; Arch. Tod, W. S. Agent. ROXBURGHSHIRE. REPLIES FOR PHILIP ANSTRUTHER PATERSON, Esq; TO THE A
- Robert Douglas and John Ross v. John Carfrae — Answers, 17 Apr 1806 [2]
- Robert Dunlop v. James Reid and John Reid — Answers
- Robert Home-Gordon v. Hugh Rose — Petition and Complaint, 12 Nov 1790
- Robert Kennoway Ross v. Thomas Smellie and James Waddell — Defences, 25 Nov 1833 [2]
- Sir John Gordon of Invergordon v. William Forsyth — Memorial, 25 Apr 1769
- Sir John Gordon of Invergordon, Bart. v. William Forsyth — Memorial, 25 Apr 1769
- Smart v. Interlocutor of Court — Petition, 19 Dec 1793
- Thomas Ker v. Alexander Wilson — Answers, 9 Feb 1769
- Thomas Turnbull v. John Proudfoot — Answers, 12 Jan 1796
- Thomas Yeamans Elliot v. Adam Thomson — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- William Giffen v. James Hutcheson — Bill of Suspension, 24 Jan 1822
