Legal Subject: Implied Obligation |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renfew alias Watt v. Campbell | 1795 | Lease, Tack, Rent, Aliment, Succession, Implied Obligation | Katharine Renfrew, alias Watt, sought to suspend payment of rent to Sir James Campbell of Inverniel and to obtain an interdict restraining him from operating a new inn on his estate as a rival to her establishment. Campbell opposed the suspension, maintaining that Watt had no right to claim damages or abatement of rent for the new inn erected on his property. |
Documents discussing this subject (6)
- John Berry v. James Lamb — Accountant's Report, 16 Mar 1830
- Petition — James Watling against Lord Eldin's Interlocutor
- RESPONDENTS' STATEMENT of FACTS, AND ANSWERS by the Pursuers thereto.
- Robert Crawford Cumming v. James Brown — Condescendence, 1856
- Sir James Campbell v. Katharine Renfrew, alias Watt — Memorial, 12 Feb 1795
- Sir Patrick Walker of Coates v. James John Fraser — Reclaiming Note, 1 Sep 1836
