Legal Subject: Communion Elements |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heritors of Lessudden v. Inner-House Interlocuter | 1793 | Teinds, Stipend, Augmentation, Tack, Communion Elements, Heritor | The Duke of Buccleugh and other heritors of Leffudden petitioned the Court to reserve power to restrict the stipend in the event that the parish of Maxton was annexed. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Moray, et al. v. Scott | 1795 | Teinds, Stipend, Communion Elements, Jurisdiction, Aliment, Interlocutor | Moray and his co-petitioners petitioned the Court to alter Lord Ankerville Ordinary's interlocutor allocating communion elements upon their lands, arguing that the allocation violated established law and the Court's own decree. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
Documents discussing this subject (10)
- Alexander Duncan v. William Skirling and George Johnston — Answers, 23 Jun 1767
- John Howden v. Francis Howden — Summons, 31 May 1838
- Lessudden — Petition, 9 Jul 1793
- Petition Moray et al, 7 Jul 1795
- Reclaiming Petition — Teinds. Pet. Heritors of Bourtie against Inner House Interlocutor
- Riddell — Petition, 5 Jul 1796
- Sir Ralph Abercromby of Tillybody v. John Francis Erskine of Mar — Answers, 17 May 1797
- STATEMENT of FACTS for the DEFENDERS—Advocators; AND ANSWERS thereto for the Pursuers—Defenders.
- The First and Second Ministers of St Cuthberts v. The Heritors of that Parish — Minute, 5 Mar 1821
- William Shaw, Lord Cathcart and John Francis Erskine of Marr v. Robert Moodie — Answers, 14 Jan 1795
