Document Type Answers
Case John Gordon v. Dugald Gilchrist
Author Name Alexander Abercromby, Lord Abercromby
Submitted 3 Mar 1791
Marginalia? No
Main Document Length (Pages) 19
Appendix Items
Appendix Length (pages)
Repository University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)
Container UVALL Box 22 - Vol. 03 - Election Papers

Citation

Alexander Abercromby, Lord Abercromby, "Answers for Dugald Gilchrist, Esq; of Hospisdale; To The Petition of John Gordon, Esq; of Swinzie, late Lieutenant in the 39th Regiment of Foot," 3 Mar 1791 , Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive Project. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Law Library, 2015-2019.

Related Case Materials

Unto the Right Honourable The Lords of Council and Session, The Petition and Complaint of John Gordon, Esq; of Swinzie, late Lieutenant in the 39th Regiment of Foot

Answers for Dugald Gilchrist of Hospisdale, Esq; To The Petition and Complaint of John Gordon, Esq; of Swinzie, late Lieutenant in the 39th Regiment of Foot

Replies for John Gordon, Esquire, of Swinzie; To The Answers for Dugald Gilchrist of Hospisdale

Duplies for Dugald Gilchrist of Hospisdale, Esq; To The Replies for John Gordon of Swinzie, Esq

Unto the Right Honourable The Lords of Council and Session, The Petition of John Gordon, Esquire, of Swinzie, late Lieutenant in the 39th Regiment of Foot

Answers for Dugald Gilchrist, Esq; of Hospisdale; To The Petition of John Gordon, Esq; of Swinzie, late Lieutenant in the 39th Regiment of Foot