Date25 Nov 1791TypePetitionCaseDouglas, Heron, & Company v. William RiddickAuthorHenry ErskineLength25 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 07MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item Abstract AI-generated William Riddick seeks court to alter Lord Dreghorn’s interlocutor in reclaiming petition vs. Douglas, Heron & Co., arguing bond falls under septennial limitation and decree lacks valid diligence. 1 of 5 in this caseMessrs. Douglas, Heron, and Company and George Home v. William Riddick — Answers, 7 Jan 1792 →People in this documentJohn MacLaurin, Lord DreghornJohn Swinton, Lord SwintonSubjectsDebtAdjudicationArrestmentCautionerPrescriptionDiligenceInhibitionCreditorPlaces mentionedAyrEdinburghDumfriesNewlawConheath