Date13 Jan 1789TypeAnswersCaseCounsellors of the Burgh of BurntislandAuthorAlexander WightLength12 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 07Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated Respondents defend 1789 Burntisland election against complaint seeking voidance or partial relief, arguing majority votes remained valid despite bribery allegations. 1 of 5 in this caseCounsellors of the Burgh of Burntisland — Petition, 5 Mar 1790 →People in this documentAlexander WightSubjectsAlimentMagistrateSequestrationElectionElection contestReductionCreditorMala FidesPlaces mentionedEdinburghBurntislandKinghornKilrennyRaith