1793
James Scott, as pursuer, alleged that the defender Ross’s sheep had trespassed on his grounds and contended that the statute of 1686, cap. 11, entitled him to recover penalties. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- James Ross v. James Scott — Information, 14 Feb 1793February 14, 1793 Information of James Scott, Esq, arguing that the defender's sheep trespassed on his grounds and that the statute of 1686, cap. 11, applies to recover penalties
- James Ross v. James Scott — Information, 23 Feb 1793February 23, 1793 Information of James Ross, arguing that James Scott has no right to pasture sheep on the scattald of Upwall and Houlls, and that local customs do not override the statute of 1686.
