Date3 Sep 1795TypeAnswersCaseMacwhinnie v. BurtonLength14 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated September 3, 1795 Information of the respondent, arguing that the petitioner's adjudication must be reduced in totum because the debt was substantially paid and compounded in 1784. View larger map →← Burton — Petition, 16 Jun 17952 of 4 in this caseAlexander Burton v. Andrew M'Whinnie — Replies, 1 Dec 1795 →People in this documentDavid Cathcart, Lord Alloway✳SubjectsDebt✳Adjudication✳Bankruptcy✳Sequestration✳Tack✳Reduction✳Assignation✳Creditor✳Places mentionedAyr✳Wigtown✳Wigton✳