Date9 Feb 1796TypeRepliesCaseMackay v. HoustonLength7 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12 Abstract AI-generated February 9, 1796 Replies of Æneas Mackay of Scotstown, Esq; to the Answers for Mr Hugh Houstoun of Creech, arguing that his claim was fully compliant with statutory requirements for inrolment. View larger map →← Æneas Mackay v. Hugh Houston — Answers, 15 Jan 17963 of 4 in this caseMackay v. Houston — Duplies, 18 Feb 1796 →People in this documentEric Mackay, Lord Reay✳Francis Napier, Lord Napier✳Sir James Montgomery, of Stanhope, Bart.✳SubjectsRetour✳Freehold Qualification✳Infeftment✳Wadset✳Assignation✳Charter✳Seisin✳Disposition✳Places mentionedAyrshire✳Perth✳Skibo✳