1796–1798
John Tait, as factor for Spens’s executors, pursued the Gillons for payment of a debt arising from a 1780 holograph account, claiming £82 8s 9d and rejecting the defenders’ assertion of £106 17s 3d. Walter Spens subsequently petitioned the Court to alter Lord Stonefield’s interlocutor, which had found him subsidiarily liable for the debt should the executors’ estate prove exhausted.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Tait v. Lord Stonefield's Interlocutor — Petition, 13 Dec 1796John Tait, as factor for Spens’s executors, claims Gillons owe 82l. 8s. 9d. from Spens’s 1780 holograph account, rejecting defenders’ inflated 106l. 17s. 3d. claim.
- Tait v. Lord Stonefield's Interlocutor — Petition, 4 Jul 1798July 4, 1798 Petition of Walter Spens, asking the Court to alter Lord Stonefield's interlocutor, which found him subsidiarie liable for a debt after executors' estate was exhausted
