First page of the earliest case documentFirst page — click to view
1781
Bill (Financial Instrument)Prescription

Charger James Sommerville sued William Weir for payment of a bill accepted by William's late father, George Weir. William challenged the suit based on the sexennial prescription (i.e., the statute of limitations). Sommerville argued that the prescription did not apply because it had been interrupted by partial payments or, alternatively, by the acknowledgements of William's agents.

Documents in this case (1)

  • Sommerville — Petition, 2 Aug 1781
    August 2, 1781 Petition of R. Hodshon Cay asking the Court to alter its interlocutor, on the grounds that prescription was interrupted by partial payment and acknowledgments by debtor and agents.

Charger James Sommerville sued William Weir for payment of a bill accepted by William's late father, George Weir. William challenged the suit based on the sexennial prescription (i.e., the statute of limitations). Sommerville argued that the prescription did not apply because it had been interrupted by partial payments or, alternatively, by the acknowledgements of William's agents.