Document Type | Answers |
---|---|
Case | Earl of Mansfield v. The Duke of Queensberry, and other Heritors of the Parish of Dornock |
Author Name | Henry Erskine |
Submitted | 20 Dec 1798 |
Marginalia? | No |
Main Document Length (Pages) | 10 |
Appendix Items | |
Appendix Length (pages) | |
Repository | University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections) |
Container | UVALL Box 16 |
Citation
Related Case Materials
Unto the Right Honourable The Lords of Council and Session, Commissioners for Plantation of Kirks and Valuation of Teinds, The Petition of The Right Honourable William Earl of Mansfield and his Curators
Answers for The Heretors of Dornock, to the Petition of the Right Honourable William Earl of Mansfield, and his Curators
Unto the Right Honourable The Lords of Council and Session, Commissioners for Plantation of Kirks, and Valuation of Teinds, The Petition of William, Duke of Queensberry; James Hope Johnston, Earl of Hopetoun; Sir William Pulteney, Bart. and others, Heretors of the Parish of Dornock
Answers for The Right Honourable William Earl of Mansfield, to the Petition for the Duke of Queensberry and others, Heritors of the Parish of Dornock
Memorial for William, Duke of Queensberry, James Hope Johnstone, Earl of Hopetoun; Sir William Pulteney, Baronet, and Others, Heretors of the Parish of Dornock; against The Right Honourable William Earl of Mansfield
Memorial for William, Duke of Queensberry; James Hope Johnstone, Earl of Hopetoun; Sir William Pulteney, Baronet, and Others, Heretors of the Parish of Dornock; against The Right Honourable William Earl of Mansfield
Memorial for The Right Honourable William Earl of Mansfield, against His Grace The Duke of Queensberry and other Heritors of the Parish of Dornock
Memorial for The Right Honourable William Earl of Mansfield, against His Grace the Duke of Queensberry and other Heritors of the Parish of Dornock