This case concerns a trust disposition granted by William Alexander to John Walker in September 1775, shortly before an English commission of bankruptcy was awarded against the former. The largest English creditors of William Alexander held mortgages on two Grenada estates jointly owned by him and his brother. They brought an action to have the above-mentioned trust-deed reduced. In January of 1778 Lord Monboddo assoilzied (absolved) the defender. The pursuers petitioned the Court to alter this decision. They argued that the trust was voided by a petition for a sequestration brought before Lord Gardenstone by William Alexander in April 1777. In addition, the pursuers argued that the trust-deed failed under the statutes 1621 (relating to conjunct and confident persons) and 1696 (regarding diligence), "or, at least, that they ought, without hesitation, to be reduced, on the head of fraud, at common law." Regarding this charge of fraud, the pursuers claimed that they had an indisputable claim to the proceeds of the Grenada plantations, but that the Alexander brothers, aided by the defender, went through elaborate lengths to conceal these profits from their creditors. They further accused William Alexander of sending his trunk of papers to Edinburgh, so as to prevent the pursuers from discovering this fraud. The Court altered Lord Monboddo's interlocutor, sustaining the reasons of reduction. William Alexander then petitioned the Court to alter this interlocutor, which it refused. Similarly, the defender petitioned the Court to either allow the trust to subsist in the person of another trustee, or to declare as bona fide his prior actions as trustee. The circumstances surrounding this case are covered extensively in Jacob M. Price, France and the Chesapeake. In particular, see volume 2, pages 691-700.
Documents in this case (4)
- Walpole — Petition, 21 Feb 1778February 21, 1778 Petition of the pursuers asking the Court to alter Lord Monboddo's interlocutor.
- Messrs Walpole and Ellison and Messrs Walpole, Clarke, and Bourne v. John Walker — Answers, 4 Mar 1778March 4, 1778 Response of the defender to the pursuers' petition
- Wilson and Scott v. Alexander — Petition, 23 Jun 1778June 23, 1778 Petition of William Alexander asking the Court to alter its interlocutor
- Walker — Petition, 23 Jun 1778June 23, 1778 Petition of the defender asking the Court to vary its interlocutor
People & places in this case
People involved
- Thomas Walpole — Pursuer
- William Alexander, of Blackhouse — Petitioner
- Robert Ellison — Pursuer
- Richard Walpole — Pursuer
- George Clarke — Pursuer
- Thomas Bourne — Pursuer
- John Walker — Defender
- Sir William Miller, Lord Glenlee, 2nd Baronet of Glenlee — Advocate for Pursuer
- Sir Ilay Campbell, Lord Succoth, 1st Baronet of Succoth — Advocate for Defender
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Petitioner
- James Burnett, Lord Monboddo — Lord Ordinary
- Samuel Mitchelson Jr., of Clermiston — Agent
- John Acton, Esq. — Agent
- Robert Alexander, of Boghall and Blackhouse — Named in case documents
- John Moir, of Hillfoot — Named in case documents
- Francis Garden, Lord Gardenstone — Named in case documents
- Alexander Lockhart, Lord Covington — Named in case documents
- William Alexander and Sons — Named in case documents
- Alexander-John Alexander — Named in case documents
- James Erskine, Lord Barjarg and Alva — Named in case documents
- Cliff, Walpole, & Clarke — Named in case documents
- Walpole & Ellison — Named in case documents
- Bank of England — Named in case documents
- Court of the King's Bench — Named in case documents
- Edward Payne, Esq. — Named in case documents
- James Sperling, Esq. — Named in case documents
- Robert White, of Fenchurch Buildings — Named in case documents
- William Braidwood — Named in case documents
- David Oliphant — Named in case documents
- Mr Strachan — Named in case documents
- Mr. Goostrey — Named in case documents
- Mr. Dickieson — Named in case documents
- David Russell — Named in case documents
- Alexander Tait — Named in case documents
- Edinburgh Evening Courant — Named in case documents
- Robert Gillespie — Named in case documents
- Grenada Court of Chancery — Named in case documents
- Adam Fairholme — Named in case documents
- Thomas Fairholme — Named in case documents
- Captain Henry Steele — Named in case documents
- Hugh Bell, & Company — Named in case documents
- Robert Auld — Named in case documents
- William Law, Esq., of Elvingston — Named in case documents
- John Montgomery Beaumont — Named in case documents
- John Thomson, Esq. — Named in case documents
- John Lockhart, of Lee — Named in case documents
- Douglas, Heron, and Company — Named in case documents
This case concerns a trust disposition granted by William Alexander to John Walker in September 1775, shortly before an English commission of bankruptcy was awarded against the former. The largest English creditors of William Alexander held mortgages on two Grenada estates jointly owned by him and his brother. They brought an action to have the above-mentioned trust-deed reduced. In January of 1778 Lord Monboddo assoilzied (absolved) the defender. The pursuers petitioned the Court to alter this decision. They argued that the trust was voided by a petition for a sequestration brought before Lord Gardenstone by William Alexander in April 1777. In addition, the pursuers argued that the trust-deed failed under the statutes 1621 (relating to conjunct and confident persons) and 1696 (regarding diligence), "or, at least, that they ought, without hesitation, to be reduced, on the head of fraud, at common law." Regarding this charge of fraud, the pursuers claimed that they had an indisputable claim to the proceeds of the Grenada plantations, but that the Alexander brothers, aided by the defender, went through elaborate lengths to conceal these profits from their creditors. They further accused William Alexander of sending his trunk of papers to Edinburgh, so as to prevent the pursuers from discovering this fraud. The Court altered Lord Monboddo's interlocutor, sustaining the reasons of reduction. William Alexander then petitioned the Court to alter this interlocutor, which it refused. Similarly, the defender petitioned the Court to either allow the trust to subsist in the person of another trustee, or to declare as bona fide his prior actions as trustee.
The circumstances surrounding this case are covered extensively in Jacob M. Price, France and the Chesapeake. In particular, see volume 2, pages 691-700.