1784–1785
This case was about a jointure (estate) settled on Janet Duncan, the second wife of John Sloss Sr., in a contract of marriage. Sloss’s heir, John Sloss Jr., argued that the jointure should be reduced because it was exorbitant and irrational.
Documents in this case (2)
- Janet Duncan v. John Sloss — Inforrmation, 25 Sep 1784September 25, 1784 Information of the widow of John Sloss, arguing that her husband's son, as heir of provision, has no jus crediti under the antenuptial contract and cannot compete with onerous creditors
- John Sloss and others v. Janet Duncan — Information, 25 Sep 1784September 25, 1784 Information of the pursuers, arguing that the widow's claims for annuity and furniture exceed the deceased's free funds and must be restricted
People & places in this case
People involved
- Janet Duncan — Pursuer
- John Sloss Jr. — Defender
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Advocate for Pursuer
- Matthew Ross, of Candie — Advocate for Defender
- Francis Garden, Lord Gardenstone — Lord Ordinary
- Thomas Paterson — Named in case documents
- John Sloss Sr. — Named in case documents
- Janet Herbertson — Named in case documents
- Daniel Baxter — Named in case documents
- William Sloss — Named in case documents
- Samuel Duncan — Named in case documents
- John Gibson — Named in case documents
Places
Where this case took place
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 987