1793–1794
TeindsLeaseTeindPrescriptionTackAlimentThe Countess of Sutherland pursued the Officers of State to determine whether rents derived from salmon fishings were liable to vicarage teinds. The defenders argued that such rents were not teindable and that deductions ought to be denied, while the respondent maintained that salmon fishings were not subject to vicarage teinds in the absence of proof by forty years' possession and payment. The litigation turned on the criteria for establishing the teindability of salmon-fishing revenues.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Countess of Sutherland v. Officers of State — Objections, 17 Dec 1793December 17, 1793 Information of defenders, arguing that salmon-fishings rents are not teindable and deductions must be denied
- Elizabeth Countess of Sutherland and George Earl Gower v. Officers of State — Answers, 28 Jan 1794January 28, 1794 Information of the respondent, arguing that salmon fishings are not subject to vicarage-teinds unless proven by 40 years possession and payment
People & places in this case
People involved
Places
- Loth (principal)
- Clyne
- Sutherland
- Farr
- Birnie