1784–1785
TeindsTackCharterDispositionPatronageStipendGeneral Campbell petitioned against an interlocutor of Lord Elliock Ordinary, asserting that he held heritable rights to his teinds. The Officers of State responded, arguing that the tithes of Campbell’s lands in Kilvicocharmaig were heritably held and not subject to local stipend by virtue of ancient charters and possessory prescription.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Campbell v. Officers of State — Petition, 23 Nov 1784November 23, 1784 Petition of the petitioners against the interlocutor of Lord Elliock Ordinary, arguing that General Campbell has heritable rights to his teinds
- Officers of State v. Major-General Archibald Campbell — Answers, 12 Jul 1785July 12, 1785 Information of the respondent, arguing that the tithes of his lands in Kilvicocharmaig are heritably held and not subject to local stipend by virtue of ancient charters and possessory prescription.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Archibald Montgomerie, Earl of Eglinton — Party
- Dugald Campbell, of Craignish — Party
- Patrick Campbell, of Knap, Esq. — Party
- Adam Rolland, of Gask — Advocate for Party
- Matthew Montgomery — Advocate for Party
- John Scott — Advocate for Party
Places
- Glasgow (principal)
- Kilwinning
- Edinburgh
