First page of the earliest case documentFirst page — click to view
1793
AdjudicationStatuteFraudForfeiturePenaltyForgery

Dundas, as defender, argued in an information that the statute under which Brown prosecuted them did not authorize the seizure of unstamped starch without prior notice or opportunity to comply. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.

Documents in this case (1)

People & places in this case

Where this case took place

View larger map →