1830–1833
SequestrationInterlocutorLiferentRentReductionInfeftmentAndrew Zuill or Yool, farmer at Bridgend of Boquhan, raised an action of reduction against Thomas Bryce Buchanan to set aside sheriff's decrees and interlocutors obtained for unpaid farm rents and damages, alleging the proceedings were invalid and unlawful. Buchanan reclaimed against Lord Mackenzie's interlocutor and lodged defences asserting his heritable proprietorship and the validity of a liferent grant to William Gray. Zuill subsequently reclaimed, arguing that Buchanan possessed title to demand the rents during his possession of the subjects.AI-generated
Documents in this case (5)
- Andrew Zuill or Yool v. Thomas Bryce Buchanan — Summons of Reduction, 26 May 1831Andrew Zuill or Yool seeks reduction of sheriff's decrees and interlocutors obtained by Thomas Bryce Buchanan against him for unpaid farm rents and damages, asserting the proceedings were invalid and unlawful.
- Note — Reclaiming, 7 Jun 1831June 7, 1831 Reclaiming Note by Thomas Bryce Buchanan, Esq. asking the Court to recal and alter Lord Mackenzie's interlocutor
- Andrew Zuill v. Thomas Bryce Buchanan — Defences, 28 Nov 1831November 28, 1831 Defences by Thomas Bryce Buchanan against the action of reduction brought by Andrew Zuill, asserting his heritable proprietorship and the validity of the liferent grant to William Gray.
- Andrew Zuill v. Thomas Bryce — Reclaiming, 15 May 1833May 15, 1833 Reclaiming Note of Andrew Zuill or Yool, Farmer at Bridgend of Boquhan, against Thomas Bryce, arguing that the defender has title to demand rents during possession
People & places in this case
People involved
- Thomas Buchanan, 7th of Boquhan — Party
- Mungo Ponton Brown — Advocate for Party
- Sir James Moncreiff, Lord Moncreiff — Lord Ordinary
Places
- Stirling (principal)
- Killearn
- Edinburgh
- Mauchline
- Gray's Close
