1815–1822
The documents listed here are part of the Session Papers Collection at the Library of Congress. These documents have not been reassembled into cases. They are presented here as a temporary measure to ensure access. They will be reorganized into cases at a later date. This will not affect individual document citations.
Documents in this case (45)
- John Fleming v. James Brown — Summons, 16 Dec 1815 [2]December 16, 1815 Summons of the Reverend John Fleming against James Brown, accountant in Edinburgh, for breach of trust in sale of heritable lands.
- John Fleming v. James Brown — Defences, 2 Feb 1816 [2]February 2, 1816 Defences by James Brown, Accountant, against the Reverend John Fleming, asserting his conduct as trustee was lawful and his accounting practices proper under the 1793 Bankrupt Act.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 13 Jun 1816 [2]June 13, 1816 Petition of David Farquharson, Hatter in Dundee, and William Livingston, Trustee, asking the Court to approve the composition offer of 9s. in the pound, with Andrew Hood as cautioner, and to discharge the …
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 25 Nov 1816November 25, 1819 Petition of John Dinning asking the Court to permit him to practise before the sheriff-court and town courts of Glasgow, against Lord Craigie's interlocutors.
- John Dinning v. The Dean and Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow — Answers, 8 Apr 1817 [2]April 8, 1817 Answers by the Dean and Faculty of Procurators in Glasgow to the petition of John Dinning, Writer in Glasgow, responding to the argument that the Faculty is a monopoly.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 26 May 1817 [2]May 26, 1817 Petition of John Haigh, Jun. asking the Court to alter its interlocutor which found no expenses due
- William M'Gavin v. John Haigh — Answers, 17 Jun 1817 [2]June 17, 1817 Answers by John Haigh, Jun. Merchant in Manchester, to the petition of William M'Gavin, Merchant in Glasgow, responding to claims of damages for goods.
- John Downie and Robert Tennent v. Daniel MacTaggart and Others — Petition and Complaint, 17 Dec 1817December 17, 1817 Petition of Messrs John Downie and Robert Tennent, Jun. asking the Court to order the trustee to renounce the lease of Achaleek farm, in exchange for L.200 from the proprietor, to avoid litigation and …
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 13 Jan 1818 [3]January 13, 1818 Petition of Mess. Q. & J. Leitch and Mess. Haddow and Dale, asking the Court to overturn Lord Pitmilly's interlocutor in the vendition of the brig Hussaren.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 13 Jan 1818 [4]January 13, 1818 Petition of James Rentoul asking the Court to overturn Lord Gillies' interlocutor in a process of suspension against James Young
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 18 Feb 1818 [2]February 18, 1818 Petition of G. Y. Shortridge asking the Court to alter Lord Cringletie's interlocutor on a bill of suspension
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 9 Apr 1818April 9, 1818 Petition of William Johnson asking the Court to overturn Lord Cringletie's interlocutor refusing a Bill of Advocation
- Quintin and James Leitch and Haddew and Dale v. John Berry — Answers, 9 Apr 1818April 9, 1818 Answers by John Berry, Esq. Merchant in Glasgow, to the petition of Messrs Quintin and James Leitch, and Messrs HaddeW and Dale, responding to claims of unauthorized disposal of joint property.
- John Graham and Others v. William Clark and Others — Summons, 16 May 1818May 16, 1818 Summons of Declarator by John Graham & Others, managers of the Free Presbyterian Society in Glasgow, against William Clark & Others, seat-holders, demanding payment of increased feu-duty for minister's stip…
- John Graham v. John Gibb — Answers, 21 May 1818May 21, 1818 Defences by John Gibb, William Meikle, and others, against John Graham and others, asserting that the managers have no right to impose increased feu-duties on seat-holders without consent of all proprietors.
- Robert Cross v. John Cross — Bill of Advocation, 30 May 1818 [2]May 30, 1818 Bill of Advocation of Robert Cross, farmer, Mackinfauld, against John Cross, spirit-dealer, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- Robert Tennent and Others v. Thomas M'Intosh — Bill of Advocation, 20 Feb 1818June 2, 1818 Bill of Advocation of Robert Tennent and Others, owners of the steam-boat Glasgow, against Thomas M'Intosh, asking the Court to overturn interlocutors holding them liable for wages owed to a workman employe…
- Robert Hunter v. James Munn — Defences, 16 Jun 1818 [2]June 16, 1818 Defences by James Munn, ship-builder in Greenock, against Robert Hunter, merchant in Greenock, asserting that the bills in question are mere renewals and he is already fully relieved of any obligation.
- William Johnson v. James Scott and Son — Answers, 29 Jun 1818June 29, 1818 Answers by Messrs James Scott and Son to the petition of William Johnson, arguing that they were entitled to hold and sell the cargo of deals consigned to them by Benjamin Hickson, as Hickson was the appar…
- LC Volume 06 — Reclaiming Petition, 8 Jul 1818 [2]July 8, 1818 Reclaiming Petition of the Rev. John Fleming, against Lord Pitmilly's interlocutor
- John Fleming v. James Brown — Answers, 10 Sep 1818 [2]James Brown, Edinburgh accountant, replies Sept. 10, 1818, that a trustee isn’t liable for damages from a sale without power if no loss occurred and the sale was prudent and necessary.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 11 Jan 1819 [2]January 11, 1819 Petition of John Graham, Esq, &c. against Lord Reston's interlocutors, asking the Court to alter its ruling that the majority of the Society's members have no right to compel minority contributors to fu…
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 11 Feb 1819February 11, 1819 Reclaiming Petition of John Graham, Esq. &c. against INNER-HOUSE Interlocutor, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- John Grahame and Others v. John Gibb and Others — Answers, 8 Apr 1819 [2]Respondents deny petitioners' demand to impose additional assessments for a second minister, arguing it violates the original contract permitting only one minister.
- George Mercer v. Henry Leishman — Bill of Advocation, 1819George Mercer junior seeks indemnification for legal costs defending against Henry Leishman’s prosecution over a disputed promissory note, after multiple absolvitor judgments denied him costs.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 9 Sep 1819September 9, 1819 Petition of Robert Cross, Farmer at Mackenfauld, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- Robert Cross v. John Cross — Answers, 31 Dec 1819December 31, 1819 Answers by John Cross, spirit dealer in Glasgow, to the petition of Robert Cross, farmer at Mackenfauld, responding to the claim that the letter was merely an introduction.
- Robert Gray and Son, Robertson, Reid, and Brother, James White and Son, and William Gray v. the Creditors of Alexander Greig Thomson — Petition and Complaint, 2 Dec 1820Dec 2, 1820: Robert Gray & Son petition to rescind creditors’ resolution accepting £300 from Cameron, Thomson & Co., claiming it favored self-interested minority and ignored estate’s best interest.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 13 Feb 1821 [2]February 13, 1821 Petition of Lady Mary Lindsay Craufurd, asking the Court to alter Lord Pitmilly's interlocutor in a process of suspension and interdict against road trustees for Fife.
- Robert Stewart v. John Sinclair — Bill of Advocation, 2 Mar 1821March 2, 1821 Bill of Advocation of Robert Stewart against John Sinclair, asking the Court to overturn interlocutor of Magistrates of Glasgow
- John Cross v. Robert Cross — Condescendence, 26 Apr 1821April 26, 1821 Condescendence of John Cross, Spirit-Dealer in Glasgow, responding to the petitioner's action against him.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 12 Jun 1821 [2]June 12, 1821 Petition of Lady Mary Lindsay Craufurd, asking the Court to overturn Lord Gillies's interlocutor in her action for declarator of mineral rights in Radernie.
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 27 Jun 1821 [2]June 27, 1821 Petition of Daniel Provan asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor against him, which held he was liable for a forged promissory note signed by his brother.
- William Claud Campbell v. Lady Mary Lindsay Craufurd — Information, 13 Nov 1821 [2]November 13, 1821 Information of Lady Mary Lindsay Craufurd, arguing that the pursuer has no legal interest to demand exhibition of title-deeds relating to her estates or honours
- LC Volume 06 — Petition and Complaint, 24 Nov 1821 [2]November 24, 1821 Petition and Complaint of Robert Turner and Son, asking the Court to annul the creditors' resolutions permitting John Dunn to leave the kingdom and to find the parties liable for expenses
- LC Volume 06 — Condescendence, 3 Dec 1821 [2]December 3, 1821 Condescendence of William Ure, against his creditors, asserting his inability to pay debts due to illness, legal costs, and imprisonment.
- William Ure v. Tayler & Gardner — Answers, 13 Dec 1821December 13, 1821 Answers by Messrs Tayler & Gardner to the condescendence of William Ure, arguing that the pursuer has concealed property and misrepresented his insolvency to obtain a decree of Cessio.
- William Ure v. Messrs Taylor and Gardner — Replies, 3 Jan 1822 [3]January 3, 1822 Replies for William Ure, late Mathematical Instrument Maker in Glasgow, present Prisoner in the Tolbooth of Glasgow, pursuing a Cessio Bonorum, responding to the Answers for Messrs Taylor and Gardner.
- LC Volume 06 — Duplies, 15 Jan 1822 [2]June 15, 1822 Duplies for Messrs Tayler & Gardner to the replies of William Ure, present prisoner, arguing that the respondents' conduct is inhuman and oppressive, and that their opposition to the Cessio is malicious an…
- Alexander Baird v. Alexander Waddell — Bill of Suspension, 4 Feb 1822 [2]February 4, 1822 Bill of Suspension by Alexander Baird, farmer in Newmains, against Alexander Waddell, Esq., asserting that he was wrongfully charged as indorser of a promissory note without due protest or intimation of…
- Robert Turner and Son v. William Wilson, Ebenezer Brown, and James Watson — Replies, 5 Mar 1822March 5, 1822 Replies of Robert Turner and Son, Blacksmiths in Greenock, to the Answers of William Wilson and Ebenezer Brown, creditors, against the resolution of the creditors' meeting to send the bankrupt John Dunn ab…
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 14 May 1822May 14, 1822 Reclaiming Petition of James Watson, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor against Lord Craigie's judgment
- Robert Turner and Son v. William Wilson, Ebenezer Brown, and James Watson — Answers, 3 Jan 1822 [3]Creditors and trustee defend sending bankrupt to Jamaica to aid attorneys, rejecting petitioners' collusion claims.
- William Wilson and Ebenezer Brown and James Watson v. R. Turner and Son — Duplies, 4 Jun 1822June 4, 1822 Duplies of the respondents to the petitioners' replies, arguing that the resolutions of October 26, 1821, were not unjustifiable and that the petitioners' attack on their conduct is unfounded.
