Date21 Jun 1793TypeDupliesCaseArchibald and James Robertson v. John LairdAuthorAdam Rolland, of GaskLength6 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 08Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated June 21, 1793: John Laird’s replies to Archibald & James Robertson, disputing that calling at an English port implied discharge liberty at Hull. ← Archibald and James Robertson and Company v. John Laird — Replies, 22 May 17934 of 4 in this caseSubjectsDebtAdjudicationInsuranceStatutePenaltyHouse of LordsPlaces mentionedGreenockHull (Kingston upon Hull)