Date27 Jan 1791TypeAnswersCaseSir Alexander Campbell, Baronet v. David BallingallAuthorHenry ErskineLength7 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 07Appendix1 item (1 pp.) Abstract AI-generated January 27, 1791 Answers by David Balingall to the condescendence for Sir Alexander Campbell and others, denying allegations of altered circumstances affecting his possession or right. 1 of 3 in this caseSir Alexander Campbell, Baronet v. David Ballingall — Petition, 8 Feb 1791 →SubjectsFreeholderPossessionElection contestFactorFeu dutiesIntromissionPlaces mentionedStirlingshireGlasgowStirling