Date8 Feb 1772TypeDupliesCaseForbes v. HomeAuthorJohn Davidson Length7 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 02Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated Respondents reject suspenders' reply as insufficient, asserting feus were granted under council act of 1767 and parties knew conditions. ← Forbes v. Home — Replies4 of 5 in this caseSir William Forbes, and others v. Messrs Home, Young and Trotter — 6 Feb 1772 →People in this documentJohn Davidson, of Stewartfield and HaltreeSubjectsFeuContractConditionPlaces mentionedEdinburgh