Date29 Jun 1793TypeDupliesCaseSteuart v. RamsdenLength9 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 10MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item (4 pp.) Abstract AI-generated June 29, 1793 Information of the respondent, arguing that Mr Hill's accounting irregularities constituted clear breaches of parliamentary statute and that penalties were not excessive ← David Steuart v. John Ramsden — Replies, 21 Jun 17934 of 6 in this caseRamsden — Petition, 17 Dec 1793 →SubjectsBankruptcySequestrationStatuteFraudForfeiturePenaltyAct of ParliamentPlaces mentionedLondon