Date5 Feb 1793TypeAnswersCaseLauder v. GibsonLength9 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 09MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated February 5, 1793 Answers by William Gibson to the petition and complaint of Dr Colin Lauder, responding that the road in dispute was necessary for his farm and that the interdict caused him great patrimonial loss. 1 of 3 in this caseLauder — Petition, 11 Apr 1793 →People in this documentJohn Swinton, Lord SwintonSubjectsAdjudicationAlimentLeaseSequestrationTackSuspensionDamagesInterdictPlaces mentionedFala and SoutraDalkeithEdinburgh