Date12 May 1794TypeAnswersCaseCurtis, et al. v. ChippendaleLength18 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 10MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated May 12, 1794 Memorial of the respondent, arguing that the law of Scotland on compensation is well established and must not be altered to conform to English practice. View larger map →← Curtis — Petition, 15 Jan 17942 of 4 in this caseWilliam Curtis, Ebenezer Maitland and John Newman Caussmaker v. Edward Chippendall — Memorial, 4 Sep 1794 →SubjectsDebtBankruptcyCautionerBill of ExchangeSequestrationCompensationCreditorLaw of Scotland