Date3 Sep 1795TypeAnswersCaseMacwhinnie v. BurtonLength14 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated September 3, 1795 Information of the respondent, arguing that the petitioner's adjudication must be reduced in totum because the debt was substantially paid and compounded in 1784. ← Burton — Petition, 16 Jun 17952 of 4 in this caseAlexander Burton v. Andrew M'Whinnie — Replies, 1 Dec 1795 →People in this documentDavid Cathcart, Lord AllowaySubjectsDebtAdjudicationBankruptcySequestrationTackReductionAssignationCreditorPlaces mentionedAyrWigtownWigton