Date1 Sep 1803TypePetitionCaseStein v. MarshallAuthorJohn Clerk, Lord EldinLength24 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 19MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated Petitioners challenge an interlocutor’s refusal to grant their bill of advocation, alleging James Marshall maliciously defamed Stein to obstruct creditor consent. 1 of 3 in this caseStein v. Marshall — Petition, 26 Nov 1803 →People in this documentJohn Clerk, Lord EldinJames Marshall, Esq.James LamondSubjectsDebtBankruptcyAlimentDefamationInterlocutorCreditorLibelMala FidesPlaces mentionedEdinburghStirlingLeithKilbagie