1798–1799
TeindsHeritorPrescriptionTeindTackStipendCatharine Pate, John Dickson, and Robert Dickson petitioned against Lord Swinton's interlocutor, arguing that bygone teinds were cut off by quinquennial prescription. Lady Christian Graham, Executrix, answered through her Commissioner and Factor, responding to this prescription argument.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Pate — Petition, 14 Nov 1798November 14, 1798 Petition of Catharine Pate, John Dickson, and Robert Dickson against Lord Swinton's interlocutor
- Lady Christian Graham v. Catharine Pate, John Dickson and Robert Dickson — Answers, 12 Dec 1798December 12, 1798 Answers by Lady Christian Graham, Executrix, and her Commissioner and Factor, to the petition of Catharine Pate and others, responding to the argument that bygone teinds are cut off by quinquennial pre…
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Dickson, of Kilbucho — Party
- Robert Dickson — Party
- Thomas Walker Baird — Advocate for Party
- David Williamson Robertson Ewart, of Balgray — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Greig, W.S. — Advocate for Party
- John Swinton, Lord Swinton — Lord Ordinary
