1795
DebtBankruptcyCreditorAlimentArrestmentSequestrationThe pursuer Ritchie, in the interest of the creditors of Peter Logan, sought to set aside a preference granted to Colin Lauder, surgeon of the Sutherland Regiment of Fencibles, as fraudulent. Lauder petitioned the Court to remit the interlocutor of which he complained and to supersede extract until the following January. The creditors subsequently informed the Court that the preference was fraudulent and ought to be reduced.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Lauder — Petition, 22 Jan 1795January 22, 1795 Petition of Colin Lauder, Surgeon of the II. or Sutherland Regiment of Fencibles, asking the Court to remit the interlocutor complained of, superseding extract till the third sederunt day in January nex…
- Alexander Ritchie v. Colin Lauder — Answers, 12 Feb 1795February 12, 1795 Information of the creditors of Peter Logan, arguing that a fraudulent preference granted to Colin Lauder must be set aside
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Weir — Party
- Alexander Carnegy Ritchie — Party
- William Erskine, Lord Kinneder — Party
- Henry Home Drummond, of Blairdrummond — Party
- Robert Forsyth, of Redhouse, Advocate — Advocate for Party
Places
- Edinburgh (principal)
- Aberdeen
- Carrick
- Mauchline
- Sutherland