1793
TackInterlocutorLeaseAlimentSuccessionHeritorWilliam Robertson petitioned the Court on behalf of Halliday to alter Lord Craig’s recent interlocutor against Messrs Riddell and Mr Davidson. The respondents opposed the removal petition, arguing that the lease allowed Ravenscroft to retake possession at Whitsunday after majority with nine months’ notice.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Halliday — Petition, 26 Feb 1793February 26, 1793 Petition of William Robertson asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor against Messrs Riddell and Mr Davidson
- John Ravenscroft v. Jean Halliday, John M‘Chefney and Margaret M‘Chefney — Answers, 4 Mar 1793Respondents oppose removal petition, claiming lease allows Ravenscroft to retake Whitsunday after majority with nine-month notice.
People & places in this case
People involved
- William Erskine, Lord Kinneder — Advocate for Party
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Lord Ordinary
Places
- Kirkcudbright (principal)
- Minnigaff
