1786
ArrestmentDiligenceSistSequestrationDebtLis Alibi PendensJohn Wilson and James Robb, as present Provost and Jailor, argued that they were not liable to William Love because a lis pendens barred diligence from the pursuer Hunt’s bill-chamber appearance. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (1)
- William Hunt junior v. John Wilson and James Robb — Memorial, 12 Jun 1786John Wilson and James Robb, as present Provost and Jailor, argue June 12, 1786, they’re not liable to William Love due to a lis pendens barring diligence from the pursuer’s bill-chamber appearance.
People & places in this case
People involved
- William Hunt, yr. of Pittencrieff — Party
- Allan Maconochie, Lord Meadowbank — Advocate for Party
- Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord Kennet — Lord Ordinary
- William Alexander, of Blackhouse — Named in case documents
Places
- Dunfermline (principal)
- Edinburgh
- Kilbagie
