Date6 Mar 1776TypeAnswerCaseCassillis v. StephensonAuthorSir Ilay Campbell, Lord Succoth, 1st Baronet of SuccothLength7 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 03Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated March 6, 1776 Answers by Andrew Stephenson, John Whitlock, and Thomas Everit to the petition of David Earl of Cassillis and others, responding to the argument that George Tod lacks authority as common agent. ← Cassillis v. Stephenson — Petition, 1 Mar 17762 of 2 in this casePeople in this documentWilliam Craig, Lord CraigDavid Kennedy, Earl of CassillisThomas EveritJohn Bell, W.S.Alexander Abercrombie, W.S.SubjectsDebtBankruptcyRanking of CreditorsTrusteeInterlocutorRanking and SaleCreditorAgentPlaces mentionedAyrGlasgowEdinburghLondonDunure