Jean Farquharson v. Alexander Anderson — Petition, 10 Jul 1800 [2]

•, [BILL-CHAMBER. J I (' J~1.!.r <?N 1P&o61 (I I, 1 T • I I • r • • (l • PET.'A;'LEX. ANDERSON, Efq; AGAINS,T ' " l..ord; <.'.:AA IG~s.Intelilocutot~ · I • '_, ' Jo. Morijon, W. S. Age11t • • • • UNT 'O THE RIG!IT HONOURABLE • T BE LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, THE OF ALEXANDER ANDERSON Efq; of Candacraig; • HUMBLY SHEWETH, ' HA 1~ 011 advifing the mutual informations, reported by Lord Craig, i-11 the queftion betwixt the petitioner and Mils Jean Farqt1harfon, relative to the ope11ing of the feals, which l1ad been put by the Cornrniffaries of Edinbu1·gh on the depofition of Ifo­ bel Duncan, and alfo the ii1terrogatories for Janet Cameron, both \vitntfies in the above caufe, his Lordiliip was pleafed, of this- • date, to pronounce the following inte1·locutor, on the bill of ad- zd July, figned vocat1on prefented by Mifs Farquharfon: 'Tl1e Lord 01·dinary 3d, 1800. ' having· confidered this bill, with the info1·rnations, and whole ' caufe, and advifed with the Lorcls, i·ernits to tl1e Co111miffaries ' to alter the interlocuto1· complained of, to fuftain tl1e objeCl: ions- ' to opening the depoG tion of Ifobel Duncan, and tl1e fealecl ' packet~ t •- •- • • • •- • • I I I I I I • '. • •, • [2] •• • • ' 'I,' ·:)- llfl' ~ packet, containing interrogatories for Janet CJ!"JD~rcw; iiJilds ex­ ' peaces due, and allows an accouz:it thereof to be given in.' The petitioner has taken the liberty, in nrder to· ·rave your Lo1·dfuips the trouble of reading two papers, to argue this cafe in a feparate petition prefented by him on the qt1fl:fiion ·as to the ad­ miffibility of the Mifies Forbes and the Reve1·end Mr Gordon, and to which he humbly begs leave to refer yo11r Lordlhiffes.., • May it therefo1·e pleafa yot1r Lordjhips, to remit to L ord Craig to alter the interloc11tor above 1·ecited, arid to renzit to the Commi_!fa1·ies, wiJtb. in)lrtttiio.ns.. io repel t.he objeCiion to the opening of the depefz1ion of lfobel Dz111ca1z, a11d the Jealed ' packet coritai11ing the' i?i"t'ilr1·ogatories to be put to Janet Caine­ J·on; a11d to ordi1i11 the Ja11ze to nzake pa1·t of the proof in this ca1ife. According· to Jufl:ice, t:!ic. • • •, • • • ' I RAE.