As to the execution of deeds, see Deeds. Writ. Testim Clause.
Definition source
Bell, William, A Dictionary and Digest of the Law of Scotland, 7th ed. rev. George Ross (Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute, 1861), s.v. “Domicile.” Public domain.
Legal Subject: Domicile |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Heritors and Kirk-Session of the Parish of Dalmellington v. The Magistrates, Minister and Kirk-Session of Irvine | 1800 | Aliment, Heritor, Interlocutor, Domicile, Parish, Succession | This case determined which of three parishes—Irvine, Dalrymple, or Dalmellington—was required to provide for the maintenance of James Wallace, an insane pauper. The statutory obligation to aliment certain persons was assigned to parishes based on residency. However, Wallace was an itinerant worker, complicating the analysis. Before losing the ability to support himself, Wallace had been a dance master who spent winters in the town of Irvine but traveled in the summer to teach. He spent his early years in Dalrymple and later went to Dalmellington, where he was employed for a time. More than a dozen witnesses from the three parishes testified about Wallace’s whereabouts over the course of his life, giving sometimes contradictory evidence. The court found that the parish of Irvine was liable, comparing Wallace to tradesmen who travel to seek work in the summer. |
Documents discussing this subject (44)
- Alexander Buchanan v. Charles Stewart Parker — Answers, 20 Dec 1825
- Andrew Gray v. Magistrates of the Town of Dumfries — Answers, 7 Oct 1780 [2]
- Andrew McDouall and James McDouall v. Christian Brown of Coalstoun, Countess of Dalhousie, George, Earl of Dalhousie, and James Andrew, Lord Ramsay — Condescendence, 3 Apr 1800
- ANS.—James Pedie, W.S. TO PET.—Alexander Grant. PARTY, Agent. Sir Robert Dundas, Clerk. Edinburgh, 16th February 1822.—The Lords having heard this Petition, they appoint the same t
- Charles Ladd Christian v. Laura Mary Ladd or Christian — Note
- Charles Pybus Ladd Christian v. Laura Mary Ladd or Christian — Answers, 28 Feb 1851
- Charles Stewart v. William Ireland — Replies, 7 Jan 1797
- Dame Mary Marjoribanks and Frederick North v. John James Hope Johnston, John Cheape, and John Hope — Condescendence
- DEFENDERS' STATEMENT of FACTS. ANSWERS to the Defenders' Statement of Facts.
- Edward Milligan, Esq. and Others v. Elizabeth Milligan and Husband — Information, 18 Jan 1825
- Edward Ommanney v. Lydia Mariana Douglas — Information, 23 Feb 1793
- Elizabeth Milligan or Burnie v. Edward Milligan and John Kerr — Information, 7 Apr 1825
- Fraser, Reid, and Sons v. Lancaster and Jamieson — Replies, 4 Sep 1794
- GATION COMPANY, Matthew Wotherspoon and Alexander Johnstone v. Thomas Bishop — Answers
- George Munro and Charles Munro v. Mrs Mary Seymour Law or Munro — Respondents' Case, 21 Jun 1836
- Isaac Graham v. Robert Little — Answers, 27 Feb 1857
- Isabella Buchanan or Downie v. John Downie — Summons, 22 Feb 1837
- Isobel Buchanan or Downie v. John Downie — Minute, 22 Feb 1837 [2]
- Jean Colville v. William Lauder — petition, 29 Nov 1799
- John Cooper v. John William Bell & Others — Bill of Suspension, 15 Jan 1836
- John Thomson v. James Knox — Revised Minute of Debate [3]
- Lady Nisbett v. John Nisbett — Answers, 1 Dec 1829
- M'Doualls v. M'Douall and Others — Memorial
- Margaret Scruton v. John Gray — Memorial, 25 Oct 1772
- Marianne Homfray v. Thomas Newte — Memorial, 10 Mar 1813
- Marion Elsherson, Donald Robertson and Richard Murray v. James Davidson — Information, 12 Oct 1776 [2]
- Messrs Gillow & Company v. Charles Montolieu Burges — Answers, 4 Sep 1825
- Min. in Process Mrs BINGHAM, AGAINST Sir Charles Douglas's TRUSTEES. MINUTES PETITION of Edward Ommaney, Esq; and others, Trustees of Sir Charles Douglas.
- Mrs Rebecca Hog v. Thomas Hog — Answers, 26 Feb 1791
- Mrs Rebecca Hog v. Thomas Hog — Answers, 26 Feb 1791 [2]
- Notes of Opinions on Petition for Charles Selkirk and Answers for Cropper and Dow
- Petition — Add. Pet.—Tho. Hog, Esq; against an Innerhouse Interlocutor
- Petition — James Robson against Lord Gardenston's Interlocutor
- Petition — Messrs M'PHERSON & M'LACHLAN against Lord Eldin's Interlocutor
- Petition — Mrs Lashley and Husband against Inner House Interlocutor
- Petition — William Rae against Lord Stonefield's Interlocutor [2]
- Reclaiming Petition — Thomas Jeudwine, Esq. against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Robert Munnoch v. Alexander Dewar — Reclaiming Petition, 18 Feb 1831
- Stirling, Gordon, and Company v. Janet Wingate and John Smith — Information, 19 Dec 1810
- The Heritors and Kirk-Session of the Parish of Dalmellington v. The Magistrates, Minister and Kirk-Session of Irvine — answers, 3 Jul 1800
- The Heritors and Kirk-Session of the Parish of Dalmellington v. The Magistrates, Minister and Kirk-Session of Irvine — petition, 12 Dec 1800
- The Mersey & Clyde Steam Navigation Company v. Thomas Bishop & Mandatory — 28 Nov 1829
- The United Corporations of Skinners and Furriers in Edinburgh v. The Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Town-Council of the city of Edinburgh — Information, 25 Jun 1767
- William Finnie, Esq. residing in Kilmarnock, and Others, Trustees of the late James Mure Campbell v. The said James Mure Campbell's Legatees and Others — Minute, 11 Mar 1836