1796
William Gillespie and Company petitioned the Court of Session against Lord Stonefield’s interlocutor refusing a bill of advocation. Thomas Milligain answered, maintaining that he was a partner rather than a mere servant and denying the petitioners’ accusations as baseless and malicious.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Gillespie — Petition, 20 Feb 1790February 20, 1790 Petition of W. Gillespie and Co. &c. against Lord Stonefield's interlocutor, refusing a bill of advocation
- William Gillespie and Company, and Taylor and Almond v. Thomas Milligain — Answers, 27 Feb 1796February 27, 1796 Answers by Thomas Milligain to the petition of William Gillespie and Company, arguing that he is a partner, not merely a servant, and that the petitioners' accusations are baseless and malicious.
