Date3 Mar 1791TypeRepliesCaseBruce v. CunynghameAuthorMatthew Ross, of CandieLength2 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 07Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated March 3, 1791 Replies by James Bruce, Esq. to the argument of David Cunningham, Esq., referring to prior replies in the case against Sir William Cunningham ← Bruce v. Cunynghame — Answers, 22 Feb 179111 of 13 in this caseBruce v. Cunynghame — Replies, 3 Mar 1791 →