Date6 Aug 1783TypeAnswersCaseWilliam Palmer v. Charles HuttonAuthorAlexander Abercromby, Lord AbercrombyLength20 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 05 Abstract AI-generated August 6, 1783 Answer by the suspender to the petition of the charger, arguing that the purchase of the vessel was lawful and that the claim for recompence is not barred by the circumstances of the case. 1 of 2 in this caseWilliam Palmer v. Charles Hutton — Petition, 25 Feb 1785 →People in this documentAlexander Abercromby, Lord AbercrombySubjectsDebtAdjudicationArrestmentPropertyInsuranceContractPrizeRecompencePlaces mentionedCulrossFranceLeithNorfolk