Date4 Sep 1794TypePetitionCaseWylie v. Johnstone and JardineLength21 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 10MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item (9 pp.) Abstract AI-generated September 4, 1794 Information of Alexander Wylie, arguing that the bill in question was not vitiated by alteration of date, and that the suspenders were not present at Langholm when the alteration was made. 1 of 2 in this caseJohnstone — Answers, 4 Dec 1794 →People in this documentAlexander Abercromby, Lord AbercrombySubjectsDebtBankruptcyArrestmentBill of ExchangeProofSequestrationWitnessCreditorPlaces mentionedEdinburghDumfriesLangholm