Date24 Feb 1796TypeDupliesCaseCarnegie v. TurnbullLength9 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12 Abstract AI-generated February 24, 1796 Answers by the respondents to the argument made by the complainer, asserting that the complainer had divested himself of all land in the county prior to appearing at Forfar to assert a vote. ← Major Alexander Turnbull v. Sir David Carnegy, the Honourable William Ramsay Maule, and others — Replies, 11 Feb 17964 of 4 in this casePeople in this documentCharles Hay, of Newton, Lord NewtonSubjectsFreeholderAlimentFreehold QualificationElection contestThirlageSeisinDispositionPlaces mentionedForfarPanmureLetham