Date2 Jan 1796TypeAnswersCaseNairne v. CranstounLength25 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12 Abstract AI-generated January 2, 1796 Information of the respondent, arguing that the transaction between Forrester and Laidlaw was an equal exchange of obligations and that the interlocutor should not be altered View larger map →← Nairne — Petition, 3 Dec 17954 of 4 in this casePeople in this documentWilliam Nairne, Lord Dunsinnan✳David Smythe, Lord Methven✳William Tait✳SubjectsDebt✳Bankruptcy✳Arrestment✳Cautioner✳Bill of Exchange✳Sequestration✳Promissory note✳Creditor✳Places mentionedEdinburgh✳