Date24 Feb 1796TypeDupliesCaseCarnegy v. GardyneLength12 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12 Abstract AI-generated February 24, 1796 Information of the respondent, arguing that the seisin of 1773 was void and null, and therefore the 1789 seisin is valid and entitled to inrolment. View larger map →← James Lindsay Carnegy v. Charles Gardyne — Replies, 10 Feb 17967 of 8 in this caseJames Lindsay Carnegie v. Charles Gardyne — Duplies, 24 Feb 1796 →People in this documentCharles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton✳SubjectsPossession✳Deed✳Title✳Evidence✳Infeftment✳Reduction✳Charter✳Seisin✳Places mentionedDumbarton✳Forfar✳Banff✳