Date8 Feb 1794TypeMemorialCaseBrisbane v. SempillLength9 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 10MarginaliaYes Abstract AI-generated February 8, 1794 Memorial of the pursuer, arguing that Lord Sempill, as singular successor, is bound to pay a year's rent for entry, not merely two shillings Scots as claimed by the defender. 1 of 2 in this caseThomas Brisbane v. Hugh Lord Sempill — Memorial, 17 May 1794 →SubjectsRentSuccessionFeuAssignmentInfeftmentNon-EntryFeu dutiesPlaces mentionedRenfrewLondon