Date3 Sep 1795TypeAnswersCaseGibson v. ReidLength25 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12 Abstract AI-generated September 2, 1795 Information of the respondent, arguing that the entail of Hofelaw excludes the pursuer's claim to terce and that the 400 merks allowance is the full legal provision permitted ← Gibson — Petition, 19 Jun 17954 of 8 in this caseReclaiming Petition — C. Kerr Reid, Esq. against Inner-House Interlocutor →People in this documentNeil Fergusson, of PitculloSubjectsDebtTerceTailzieEntailLiferentAlimentSuccessionMarriagePlaces mentionedNorthumberland