Date5 Jun 1794TypeAnswersCaseArbutnott, et al. v. Scott, et al.Length4 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 10 Abstract AI-generated June 5, 1794 Information of the respondents, arguing that a dike with an opening is compatible with mill water supply and fish passage under act 1696 View larger map →← John Viscount of Arbuthnott and others v. James Scott of Brotherton and Charles Fullerton of Kinnaber — Answers, 5 Jun 17946 of 7 in this caseScott — Petition, 3 Jul 1794 →SubjectsProof✳Salmon Fishing✳Places mentionedStracathro✳Laurencekirk✳Arbuthnott✳Kinnaber✳